SNARKOTICS.com: where opinions come to overdose


The Undecided Called, They Want You To Stop Watching Their Shit by accordingtoalanna
October 15, 2008, 11:19 pm
Filed under: Politics, Television | Tags: , , , , ,

While perusing through my buddy list whilst watching Project Runway‘s Season Finale (I just love multi-tasking like that; it’s a skill that very few have perfected), I noticed that all of my uber political friends were “away” watching the debate (and most of their away messages consisted of something smart alecy about the candidate their against). My first reaction was “OH SHIT, I CAN’T BELIEVE I AM MISSING THE DEBATE! HOLY FUCK, WHAT AM I GOING TO DO? I DIDN’T EVEN DVR IT!” but then it hit me: CALM THE HELL DOWN, ALANNA! You already know who you’re voting for come November 4th. The debates are meant for the undecided, and since you’re far from that, go ahead with your decided self and enjoy the fashion show consisting of clothes that you will never fit into.

So this is where I went from being pissed off at Kenley Collins for giving Tim Gunn yet another attitude (what a condescending and pretentious bitch), to being pissed off at my friends. (Man, I’m either hardcore PMSing or hardcore drinking the hatorade for no apparent reason.) I’m sorry, but if you’re already adamant about who you’re voting for, why the hell are you torturing yourself watching a debate that will not only piss you off, but not benefit you what-so-ever? Unless, of course, there is a small inkling that you’re slightly unsure of your choice… or you just think Obama and McCain are dreamy to look at.

I really dislike people who plop themselves on their couch to watch the debate — wearing their “Vote for __insert candidate of your choice__” memorabilia — and then yell about the candidate they dislike for being a “moron.” No shit they’re a moron, Sherlock… THAT’S WHY YOU’RE NOT VOTING FOR THEM! So, before you stuff even more cheesy puffs into your mouth in hopes that this will comfort you, turn to BRAVO and watch some reality TV full of rainbows and sass to calm you down. I’m serious. Just fucking stop trying to prove to others that you’re a politico and start proving to yourself that you secretly want Tim Gunn to be your bff.

Leave the debates for the undecided; let the candidates attempt to win those people over, instead of unintentionally giving you more material to rant about.

And on that note… Some words of wisdom to go by for the undecided and decided alike:
make it work



Fashion for Politics by deadbeatdavid
October 6, 2008, 10:56 pm
Filed under: Politics, Popculture, Style | Tags: , , , ,

It’s everywhere you turn. On bumper stickers, scrawled across trucker hats,(OY VEY Who the fuck is still wearing trucker hats) in commercials during a television show, staring from the cover of your favorite magazine. All with one resounding message: OBAMA FASHION is sweeping our nation.

Not since JFK has a political figure been so revered and loved by (most of) the American public. And fashion, ever a source of *unique* and “understated” expression, is showing the belabored symptoms as well.

The ubiquitous Obama tee can be seen on everyone from trendy hipsters in France to the glamourous Halle and trannylicious Beyonce strolling the streets of NYC…(minus her wig of course)

Other forms of fashionable political expression are not as endearing.

 

Honestly.

Who decided to come up with an Obama Dance?

…. Sure, maybe somewhere somehow it will inspire some poor lost youngster to vote… but you have to wonder: especially in light of the Paris Hilton comparisons, is it hurting or helping his campaign?

How long is it before women start coming into the salon asking for the “Palin Bangs”

or the “Alaskan Highlights”? Come on!

Not to quote Bring it On or anything (yea I took it there) but…remember young voters, paraphernalia is strictly forboden at the voting booths so remember to leave your trendy Obama Canvas tote bag at home on election day.

Just settle for the one you bought from Strand.



Packing the Rescue Bill With Pork by christinaparrella
October 4, 2008, 2:27 pm
Filed under: Politics | Tags: , ,

Let’​s just remem​ber come elect​ion time that it was the REPUB​LICAN​S who sough​t to elimi​nate the pork-​barre​l spend​ing injec​ted into the $700 Billi​on Bailo​ut packa​ge that was desig​ned to attra​ct each state​s repre​senta​tives​.​

There​ was more than $1.7 billi​on worth​ of targe​ted tax break​s.​

The speci​al provi​sions​ inclu​de tax break​s for:

* Manuf​actur​ers of kids’​ woode​n arrow​s – $6 milli​on.​

* Puert​o Rican​ and Virgi​n Is- lands​ rum produ​cers – $192 milli​on.​

* Wool resea​rch.​

* Auto-​racin​g track​s – $128 milli​on.​

* Corpo​ratio​ns opera​ting in Ameri​can Samoa​ – $33 milli​on.​

* Small​-​ to mediu​m-​budge​t film and telev​ision​ produ​ction​s – $10 milli​on.​

Attaching these sort of sweetened up and extraneous measures, which were just meant to rally up enough votes for the bills passage, will lead to more problems in the future. This is special-interest politics at it’s finest. This isn’t OUR Congress, this is the Congress of big corporations, lobbyists and PAC’s.

Today I will be contacting my state’s representatives and senators to voice my disapproval with their voting. No this bill is not the be all end all to our economic woes, heck the day it passed the DOW dropped 200 pts. The American people who are paying for this bailout have to show our elected officials that we are not just the mules who are working to pay for Wall Street’s messes, but we have a voice and demand to be heard​. Conta​ct your repre​senta​tive to tell him/​her this is not how you want your money​ being​ spent​.​

Check how your representatives voted. HOUSE // Senate



Obama and Iran by christinaparrella
September 28, 2008, 11:35 pm
Filed under: Politics | Tags: ,

So first Obama wants to talk to Iran without preconditions, then he won’t rule out the use of force, then he says he wants to engage the Iranians directly but also press them on their nuclear ambitions, “funding” of international terrorism, and the stalemate that is the Middle East peace process.

However, it should be noted that Ahmadinejad and the Islamic Republic do not want to talk to the U.S. nor do they want to negotiate with the U.S.; it’s only the pro-reform groups in Iran who want to do so.

If Obama wants to talk without preconditions he would be violating four MANDATORY resolutions passed by the United Nations’ Security Council that impose sanctions on Iran and demand the suspension of its uranium enrichment as a precondition for negotiations. Obama would clearly be sending the wrong message to our allies in the region and to our NATO allies whose support we need in dealing with nuclear threats.

I’m not trying to start a post about how ~dangerous~ Iran is because I don’t believe it is as dangerous as the media make it out to be. There is currently a struggle for power inside Iran within the Khomeinist regime and the anti-regime tension itself is rising, so this would be a stab in the back to the reform groups in Iran. These “talks” would not only legitimize Ahmadinejad, who faces re-election in June 2009, but they would acknowledge him and the Khomeinist regime as being equivalent to the U.S., all while those inside Iran are urging Ahmadinejad to comply with the U.N. resolutions.

It just seems counterproductive to me. I thought that Obama, supposedly being the less hawkish of the two candidates, would have come out on top in the debates regarding Iran and Pakistan but I heard more pro-Bush policies from Obama than McCain on Friday night.

For more articles and information on fellow snarkotic, christinaparrella, please visit her official site @ christinaparrella.com




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.